Friday, November 8, 2013

Lifeforce: Big fun with soul-sucking space vampires

We've all had that person in our lives at one time or another, the one whose presence just drains the energy from your body, who saps your happiness, your enthusiasm and your very will to live.

They are called emotional or psychic vampires. I don't know if those are clinical or colloquial terms, but they're accurate. People exist who suck out your life force and leave you an empty rotten husk. Which brings us to our latest entry on Fright Film Spectacular.

Psychic vampires are the villains in the 1985 film Lifeforce, which is an adaptation of a novel called The Space Vampires. Lifeforce is quite a movie. I'll stop short of calling it a classic. But it's different. And the horror genre can always use different.

The story is fairly simple: A joint British-American space mission discovers humanoids in stasis on a giant spaceship hidden in the coma of Halley's Comet. The crew returns the humanoids to their own ship, which is later discovered with said crew all burned up on it. The humanoids are, of course, mysteriously alive and intact, despite everyone else on the ship being horribly burned. The discoverers then bring the creatures to Earth. This, of course, turns out to be a huge mistake. By the time we reach the end, we've been treated to spaceships, spacewalks, giant bat aliens, vampires being turned to dust, fires, explosions, a zombie-vampire horde of Londoners, a Ghostbusters-esque funnel cloud of human souls being sucked up into the alien mothership and whole lot of nudity (more on that in a minute). How can all that not be entertaining?

As far as a scifi-horror film, it's pretty good. It's written by Dan O'Bannon, who wrote Alien and Return of the Living Dead and worked on Star Wars, so he knows his way around both genres. Director Tobe Hooper had, among other films, Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Poltergeist under his belt by the time he made Lifeforce, so he was a heavy hitter by then, too. (I know about the controversy, that a lot of people believe it was actually Steven Spielberg who did the bulk of the directing on Poltergeist, and I personally believe it was probably a joint effort, but either way, Hooper worked on it.) It's gory, and the effects are pretty good and hold up fairly well -- most of them anyway. And while the film makers were aiming for epic in scope, Henry Mancini's score makes it feel like a bigger movie than it is.

The acting is a little bombastic at times. The hero, Steve Railsback as Carlsen, reminded me of a 1950s B movie leading man. Still two years from becoming Jean-Luc Picard on Star Trek: Next Generation, Patrick Stewart puts in a decent performance as Dr. Armstrong.

But it's the overall theme I really enjoyed. And I'll be honest: I'm not one to look for a lot of metaphors and subtleties in film. For one thing, a lot of horror movies don't go for subtle. And some might have underlying themes, but I don't tend to care. What I wanted to do was create a commentary on the human condition, blah, blah, blah ...

No. You made a scary, gory movie that kept me entertained for an hour and a half. I'm not normally looking for anything any deeper. But in the case of Lifeforce I made an exception, mainly because I couldn't help it.

I don't know which of the film makers was involved with a real-life psychic vampire of a woman, but someone was. And she was the kind of girl this someone loved to hate, hated to love and had as much fun fighting with as he did making sweet love to.

You know how I know? The aforementioned nudity.

The super-hot Mathilda May, who is credited only as Space Girl, plays the main vampire and spends probably 95 percent of her on-screen time totally nude. And she's on the screen a lot. Now I've got nothing against super-hot women walking around buck naked, but it can't help but be a distraction, and after awhile you begin to wonder, "What does this alien have against pants and shirts?" I mean, I get it from a Hollywood point of view -- sex sells and all that. But from a storytelling point of view, you start to ask, how does this chick being nude in every scene move the narrative along or develop the theme?

The answer didn't dawn on me until after the film was over. It was to show the temptation. Our hero, Carlsen, knows her evil intent, and yet he is drawn to her, not just sexually and romantically, but in an emotional, molecular way. He has an addiction that is primal, animalistic. He knows he must destroy her to save the Earth, but it's nearly impossible. He even asks her aloud: why can't I break away from you? She tells him: Because you're just like me.

Translation: Yeah, I know she's a soul-sucking psychopath who makes me crazy and makes me do stupid things, and I think I'm happy with her when I'm really miserable, but I don't care because holy shit, just look at her!

And of course, a relationship like that can only end in destruction, but to find out just how, you'll have to watch the movie, which I highly recommend. It's available on DVD from Netflix, and has recently been released on Blu-ray from Scream Factory. If you follow the link, it will take you to a trailer.

4 stars

Monday, November 4, 2013

The Mummy's Hand and October recap

It's been a few days since Halloween. Fright Film Spectacular had to take a break after watching 22 horror movies in 31 days. Even though that's a few less than last year's total, it's still a lot of mayhem for the ol' brain to absorb. So after giving my mind a rest, it's time for a quick recap of this year's Fright Film Spectacular.

After three decades of watching the original Halloween nearly every Halloween night, I decided to break with tradition. I've seen the movie so many times I nearly have it memorized, plus I caught the end of it on AMC one night a couple of weeks ago. Add to that I had really intense night at work on Halloween night and I decided I needed something that didn't require a lot of brain power or effort.

The final decision was to go with The Mummy's Hand, a Universal pseudo-sequel, or perhaps re-imagining is more accurate. The Mummy's Hand came out in 1940 and concerns an archaeologist and his assistant who team up with a magician to search for a lost mummy's tomb. The mummy is guarded by an ancient Egyptian society, whose head honcho passes the torch to another scientist, who tries to stop the expedition at any cost. Of course, the mummy is eventually released and mayhem ensues. It was a fair-to-middling offering from Universal that dragged in places and mixed in a little too much humor. I gave it 2.5 stars.

It was a mediocre ending to a marathon that paled slightly to last year. But to be fair, I watched a lot of classics and bests last year while going with a few more off-beat choices this year. The final list for October with ratings, in chronological order:

Piranha 3.5
Black Sunday 5
Rodan 3
Phantom of the Opera 3
Eyes Without A Face 4
Attack of the Crab Monsters 1
Frankenstein and the Monster From Hell 3.5
Dear God No 0
The Raven 3.75
Outpost 3.25
Creepozoids 3
Vampyr 3.5
Frankenstein's Army 4
Day of the Dead (2008) 1.5
Dracula (1931) 5
My Amityville Horror 2.5
House on Haunted Hill 5
Psychomania 2.5
Hellraiser 4
House of Seven Corpses 2.25
Dead of Night 2.75
The Mummy's Hand 2.5

The average rating is 3.11. I don't have last year's average at my fingertips, but when I find it I'll add that information. My favorites of the movies I'd never seen were Black Sunday, Eyes Without A Face and Frankenstein's Army, though I'm still a little disappointed that the last one was a found-footage film. I also enjoyed The Raven, Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell and Vampyr. The worst, by far, was Dear God No, a complete and utter disaster of a movie that would've probably gotten a little leeway from me had it not suddenly decided to take itself seriously after an hour of utter camp and cheese.

Other highlights: Gained two celebrity followers, Return of the Living Dead's Beverly Randolph and scream queen Linnea Quigley. In addition to transferring Fright Film Spectacular from Twitter to Blogger, Fright Film now has its own Twitter account and the blog will now be year-round. I'll aim for one or two entries a week. And a podcast is a possibility if Fright Film Spectacular gains enough of a following. The Twitter archive from last year is being compiled and should be up shortly.

See you soon.